Komondor vs Great Pyrenees
A detailed pet insurance comparison between these two popular breeds. See which one costs less to insure and has fewer health risks.
Komondor
VS
Great Pyrenees
Side-by-Side Comparison
Komondor
VS
Great Pyrenees
Winner giant
Size
giant
80--100 lbs
Weight
85--160 lbs
10--12 yrs
Lifespan
10--12 yrs
6/10
Health Risk Score
5/10
Better
$35--$65
Better
Monthly Insurance
$35--$70
$950
Annual Claims
$900
Better
moderate
Exercise Needs
moderate
high
Grooming
moderate
low
Trainability
low
Yes
Good with Kids
Yes
No
Apartment Friendly
No
Overall Verdict
Great Pyrenees edges ahead with 2 wins vs 1.
VS
Size
giant
giant
Weight
80--100 lbs
85--160 lbs
Lifespan
10--12 yrs
10--12 yrs
Health Risk Score
6/10
5/10
Monthly Insurance
$35--$65
$35--$70
Annual Claims
$950
$900
Exercise Needs
moderate
moderate
Grooming
high
moderate
Trainability
low
low
Good with Kids
Yes
Yes
Apartment Friendly
No
No
Verdict
Great Pyrenees wins with 2 advantages
Key Verdicts
Insurance Cost
Great Pyrenees — Great Pyrenees has lower average annual insurance claims, making it the more affordable breed to insure.
Health Risk
Great Pyrenees — Great Pyrenees has a lower health risk score, indicating fewer breed-specific health concerns.
Lifespan
Komondor — Komondor tends to live longer, providing more years of companionship.
Breed Summaries
Komondor
giant · Working
- Monthly Insurance
- $35–$65
- Health Risk
- 6/10
- Lifespan
- 10–12 yrs
- Avg. Annual Claim
- $950
Great Pyrenees
giant · Working
- Monthly Insurance
- $35–$70
- Health Risk
- 5/10
- Lifespan
- 10–12 yrs
- Avg. Annual Claim
- $900
Related Comparisons
VS
Komondor vs Anatolian Shepherd
View Comparison
VS
Saint Bernard vs Great Pyrenees
View Comparison
VS
Great Pyrenees vs Bernese Mountain Dog
View Comparison
VS
Samoyed vs Great Pyrenees
View Comparison
VS
Tibetan Mastiff vs Great Pyrenees
View Comparison
VS
Anatolian Shepherd vs Great Pyrenees
View Comparison