Neapolitan Mastiff vs Bullmastiff
A detailed pet insurance comparison between these two popular breeds. See which one costs less to insure and has fewer health risks.
Neapolitan Mastiff
VS
Bullmastiff
Side-by-Side Comparison
Neapolitan Mastiff
VS
Bullmastiff
Winner giant
Size
giant
110--150 lbs
Weight
100--130 lbs
7--9 yrs
Lifespan
7--9 yrs
8/10
Health Risk Score
7/10
Better
$45--$85
Monthly Insurance
$42--$80
Better
$1,600
Annual Claims
$1,400
Better
low
Exercise Needs
moderate
moderate
Grooming
low
low
Trainability
moderate
No
Good with Kids
Yes
Better
No
Apartment Friendly
No
Overall Verdict
Bullmastiff edges ahead with 4 wins vs 0.
VS
Size
giant
giant
Weight
110--150 lbs
100--130 lbs
Lifespan
7--9 yrs
7--9 yrs
Health Risk Score
8/10
7/10
Monthly Insurance
$45--$85
$42--$80
Annual Claims
$1,600
$1,400
Exercise Needs
low
moderate
Grooming
moderate
low
Trainability
low
moderate
Good with Kids
No
Yes
Apartment Friendly
No
No
Verdict
Bullmastiff wins with 4 advantages
Key Verdicts
Insurance Cost
Bullmastiff — Bullmastiff has lower average annual insurance claims, making it the more affordable breed to insure.
Health Risk
Bullmastiff — Bullmastiff has a lower health risk score, indicating fewer breed-specific health concerns.
Lifespan
Neapolitan Mastiff — Neapolitan Mastiff tends to live longer, providing more years of companionship.
Breed Summaries
Neapolitan Mastiff
giant · Working
- Monthly Insurance
- $45–$85
- Health Risk
- 8/10
- Lifespan
- 7–9 yrs
- Avg. Annual Claim
- $1,600
Bullmastiff
giant · Working
- Monthly Insurance
- $42–$80
- Health Risk
- 7/10
- Lifespan
- 7–9 yrs
- Avg. Annual Claim
- $1,400
